PHS Home
PHS Home
 
 

The Effects of Neighborhood Greening

Urban Impact, January 2001

While the devastating effects of urban blight have made the headlines of local papers in recent years—and indeed the new City administration's agenda is to address these problems head on—residents in Philadelphia's low-income neighborhoods have struggled with its draining effects for years and have often sought out solutions on their own. Since the mid-1970s, The Pennsylvania Horticultural Society's Philadelphia Green has introduced the concept of greening as one tool for community revitalization.

In Philadelphia and other cities, residents are reclaiming parks, planting trees along streets, and transforming vacant land into community gardens and gathering places—vital "grassroots" actions to rebuild neighborhoods. Often overlooked by "big picture" plans for urban redevelopment, these greening initiatives represent the determination of residents to improve their overall quality of life in the face of often overwhelming obstacles, like crumbling abandoned buildings, trashed vacant lots, criminal elements, disinterested or defeated neighbors, and urban flight to the suburbs.

Philadelphia, for decades drained by a declining population and the loss of an industrial base that was once its lifeblood, now has the opportunity to reinvent itself in visionary ways. With its huge inventory of vacant buildings and lots—along with factors such as a lack of resources and changing housing preferences—the City will not be redeveloping all of this unused land at the same density, nor in the same time frame. Greening, then, can serve as a valuable approach—a way to blend reclaimed open space with new and reconfigured housing patterns and new commercial development. And, it can serve as both an interim and long-term strategy in re-establishing neighborhoods.

The September issue of Philadelphia Green's Urban Impact periodic series looked at the physical, social, and economic value of high-profile urban landscapes—such as gateways, downtown squares, and waterfronts. This issue looks at the same values of greening in city neighborhoods.

Greening and the Physical Environment

Though gardens, parks, and other forms of managed open space cannot on their own solve the problems associated with urban blight, they are an effective way of creating momentum and change. Perhaps the most obvious and tangible benefit of well-kept open space is how it physically and rapidly improves a neighborhood's appearance. Parks and gardens—along with streets lined with trees and barrel plantings ("garden blocks")—help soften the hard angles of a city's built environment. They bring color and vitality to even the most troubled communities and can help contribute to a sense of hope.

In Philadelphia's New Kensington neighborhood, for instance, Philadelphia Green has worked with the New Kensington Community Development Corporation for the past five years on a pilot vacant land management program. This initiative employs a number of treatment options for vacant lots, including regular cleaning and mowing, tree plantings, and the transfer of adjacent land to homeowners. Thus far, 50% of the neighborhood's 1,100 unmanaged lots have been affected. The program aims to improve the overall "curb appeal," which can then be used as a tool to attract investment opportunities and new residents to the community.

"This effort has helped contribute to a general good feeling about our neighborhood," said Sandy Salzman, Executive Director of the New Kensington CDC. "It's obvious that the program has made a tremendous physical impact," she added. "With the increasing amount of clean and green spaces—replacing what were once trashed vacant lots—people no longer feel threatened by their surroundings."

Social Benefits to Communities

Gardens and other communal spaces—ranging in size from a single rowhouse lot to an entire block—can act as havens for social interaction, bringing people out of their homes and into a shared space. And, a garden can provide an effective bridge for crossing racial, generational, and economic boundaries. For instance, with its 60 family and individual garden plots, Warrington Community Garden in West Philadelphia brings together African-American, Asian, and white residents, ranging from teenagers to grandparents. "The garden has led to a much richer and diverse community," says Warrington's Joanne Jackson. "It provides a wonderful opportunity to get to know folks that you wouldn't ordinarily meet in your everyday life."

Greening activities can also symbolize a community's drive to regain a sense of purpose, empowering residents to engage municipal agencies in local concerns. City governments are much more likely to respond to the interests of well-organized groups than to isolated requests from individuals. Marti Ross Bjornson of Northwestern University noted in her research that "the simple act of starting a garden can teach previously powerless people how to get access to city hall, and it can change the perception of the people with power who are looking into the community for the first time."

For instance, Philadelphia Green's Parks Revitalization Project—with the City's Department of Recreation as a key partner—has helped transform neighborhood parks and build the capacity of resident groups to bring about change in their communities. On their own, park groups have raised approximately $350,000, which has been earmarked for improvements and programs. Their ability to raise monies and advocate for their parks caught the attention of City government, and the Department has been able to lobby successfully for increased funding from City Council for capital work and additional maintenance staff. Philadelphia Green was able to use these developments and trends as leverage in securing more support from outside funders (The William Penn Foundation and Wallace-Reader's Digest Funds). The Parks Revitalization Project, which included three parks at its inception in 1993, now works with "friends" organizations at 24 sites.

Gardening and Cultural Heritage

Philadelphia's rich cultural heritage is reflected in its gardeners—African-Americans who moved here from the South, Puerto Ricans from the island, and those from as far away as Cambodia, China, and Laos—who have brought their ways of life and gardening traditions to their adopted city. The garden can become an interactive, hands-on teaching tool for a neighborhood, providing a forum for community elders to share their history and preserve their cultural traditions.

In the Norris Square neighborhood, Puerto Rican residents celebrate their blended Native, African, and European heritage, illustrated by a colorful mural in the garden named Raices ("roots"). Other garden murals reveal images of the island's flag, its indigenous Taino Indians, and island folklore. Through classroom and youth activities, children work in the community gardens and in Norris Square Park; they learn from their elders about history and the importance of working in service to the community. As community leader Iris Brown noted, "We want our youth to be proud of what they are and of where they come from."

Greening's Impact on Crime

Urban abandoned land is one of the most visible signs of neighborhood distress. It can lead to the perception of a community's deterioration, where it is assumed that residents have either grown apathetic to the problem or are unable to combat it. The presence of vacant land is one example of the "broken windows" theory advanced by criminologists James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling—namely, if a window in a building is broken and left unrepaired, all the rest will soon be broken.

Wilson and Kelling argue that "vandalism can occur anywhere once communal barrier—the sense of mutual regard and the obligations of civility—are lowered by actions that seem to signal that no one cares." The preponderance of vacant land casts the impression of a defeated, disinterested, and scared populace, and it is widely agreed that in areas where residents have become intimidated by their surroundings, criminal activity thrives. Yet, by working together to improve even a small parcel of land, residents convey the message that they care about creating a better community.

For example, Carroll Park in West Philadelphia has undergone a dramatic turnabout in recent years with the help of Philadelphia Green’s Parks Revitalization Project. Park leader Doris Gwaltney reminisced, "I lived around the corner from the park but wouldn’t walk through there. It was a frightening place and no one wanted to be there except 'the element,' which had taken over." But the park, on the decline for the past three decades, has rebounded. Philadelphia Green is helping the resident "friends" to become productive, long-term stewards of the park, and the Department of Recreation installed new playground equipment and has committed additional seasonal maintenance staff. With its increased recreational use, Carroll Park has become a safer place. One child who helps out in the park said, "Since we’ve been cleaning up Carroll Park, the drug dealers don't want to be there." Speaking about the future of urban parks, Gwaltney noted, "We have to remember always that a park at any time can revert (to its deteriorated state). It is vital that we keep these parks for the next generation."

Tales from Two Cities

Los Angeles

  • In Los Angeles' Pico-Union neighborhood, during the 1992 riots—all along the streets surrounding the Tenth Street Mother's Club Garden, windows were shattered and businesses torched and looted. Remarkably, the garden remained untouched.
  • In the days following the unrest in Los Angeles, gang members issued a manifesto listing among their complaints the lack of parks and green spaces in their neighborhoods.
  • A 1993 survey conducted for Rebuild Los Angeles revealed that 77% of those interviewed listed improved parks and recreation facilities as "absolutely critical" or "important" to the restoration of communities, ranking as a higher priority than the need for the creation of more businesses

San Francisco

  • In San Francisco's Mission District, the heightened activity of the Dearborn Street garden project spurned the neighbors to form a community watch group; residents documented that crime is now down by 78%.

Economic Benefits

Though there is ample evidence to support the financial benefits reaped from high-profile landscapes in city centers—such as waterfronts, large-scale parks, and downtown squares—researchers have struggled with ways to assess the economic effects of parks, gardens, and other open spaces in urban neighborhoods. Indeed, the effects are long-term, as economic prosperity comes last to poor areas. Still, examples can be found that illustrate this particular impact of open space.

In North Philadelphia, Sister Carol Keck of the Norris Square Neighborhood Project noted that with the revitalization of Norris Square Park in recent years and the rehabilitation of surrounding houses, property values have increased dramatically in this low-income community. In one example, a real estate office looked at the last three home sales in the area around the park to help determine market value for a new sale. The prices ranged from $20,000, which occurred six months prior, upwards to the remarkable amount of $80,000 for a more recent acquisition. "People now want to live around the park," Sister Carol said. "And, those already living in the community have invested in improving their homes—another sign of Norris Square's encouraging developments."

And, in another look at New Kensington, there is evidence that the real estate market is now stronger due to the positive effects generated by the neighborhood's open space program. "Three years ago, the CDC found it very difficult to sell homes it was rehabbing," noted Salzman. "But today, we're currently renovating ten properties, and seven of them have already been sold. It's subjective," she admits, "but these encouraging developments are at least in part due to the success of the open space program." Salzman also noted that properties are not only being bought by those already in the neighborhood, but by those who at one time moved away—indications that people want to be a part of an attractive, livable New Kensington.

Why Greening?

Although community gardens, parks, and other green spaces cannot alone stem the tide of urban blight, they represent an important first step in aiding distressed neighborhoods. Most tangibly, they physically enhance a neighborhood's appearance, signaling that residents proactively care about improving their quality of life. Gardens also provide opportunities for people from a range of backgrounds to come together, helping to strengthen communities. Most importantly, greening can help foster positive change, acting as a vital building block for other neighborhood improvement efforts. As the city seeks to rebuild its neighborhoods and attract reinvestment opportunities, greening should be considered as an essential component of future redevelopment plans and the livability of the urban environment.

Source Material

What Good is Community Greening? American Community Gardening Association Monograph, June 1995

Broken Windows, The Atlantic Monthly, March 1982

Healing America's Cities, Trust for Public Land, January 1994

 

 
 
Copyright ©2009 The Pennsylvania Horticultural Society  |  Privacy Policy  |   Terms of Use